Mga Kaugnay na Sipi sa Mga Bilang 15:22

Why did they say, practice follows Rebbi Simeon from Timna? ²¹⁹A very shortened version is in Horaiot 2:4; much more truncated in Babli Horaiot 8a. Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina said, from a place where all incest prohibitions were taken as one set [of sins] causing extirpation, the father’s wife came out to tell you about the bastard²²⁰All incest prohibitions (including adultery) promulgated under one heading, as one set, in Lev. Chapter 18 are punishable by divine extirpation as made clear in Chapter 20. The verses about the connection between the father’s wife and the bastard are in Deut. 23. The father’s wife represents a single element of the set of incest prohibitions. Deut. 23 has no penalties spelled out. It is presumed that the penalty common to all sins mentioned in Lev. 18 is also understood in Deut.23. Cf. Chapter 11, Note 63.. The method of Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina seems inverted. There, he infers from the set and here²²¹The topic of Horaiot 2:4, for which transgressions a purification sacrifice is due, viz., those under penalty of divine extirpation. [Simple transgressions are expiated either by the punishment imposed by the court or by sincere repentance and the Day of Atonement (Mishnah Yoma 8:7)]. he infers from one of its members. As we have stated: “The commandments of the Eternal,²²²Lev. 4:2, the introduction to the laws of the purifying sacrifice: “If a person sins inadvertently against any of the Eternal’s commandments about what should not be done, but he did one of these.” I could think that this includes also those who eat abominations and crawling things²²³Forbidden in Lev. 11; these are simple prohibitions, at most punishable by whipping.. You argue, saying that here it says “from the eyes²²⁴“Here” is the purification offering of the congregation due (Lev. 4:13) “if the entire congregation of Israel errs and something is hidden from the eyes of the community and they do one of the actions which by the commandments of the Eternal should not be done, and they do damage.” This is part of a series of 5 different statements on purification offerings. “There” is the isolated statement about the particular purification offering due for the sin of apostasy (i. e., idolatry, Num. 15:22–28). Num. 15:24 reads: “If from the eyes of the congregation it was done in error.” By the hermeneutic rule of גזירה שוה “equal cut”, parallel expressions imply parallel meanings.” and there it says “from the eyes”. Just as “from the eyes” mentioned there means something for which one is obligated for a purification sacrifice in case of inadvertent sin and extirpation in case of intentional sin, also “from the eyes” mentioned here means something for which one is obligated for a purification sacrifice in case of inadvertent sin and extirpation in case of intentional sin. But since “from the eyes” mentioned there is a case²²⁵Idolatry. involving the death penalty, does “from the eyes” mentioned here involve the death penalty? Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina said, from the place from which idolatry was singled out to teach about all who are subject to extirpation, there was no mention of anything but extirpation²²⁶The only penalty mentioned is extirpation in Num. 15:30 for the blasphemer and idolator, offenses which at other places are classified as capital crimes.. But the death penalty is written elsewhere. The method of Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina seems inverted. There, he infers from the set and here he infers from one of its members! There, all incest prohibitions were taken together as to the duty of sacrifice. Idolatry was singled out to teach who is obligated for a sacrifice²²⁷Since for idolatry the sacrifices are different from those for all other sins, it is necessary to treat this separately.. What can you say? Here, all incest prohibitions were taken together concerning of bastards. The father’s wife was singled out to teach about the bastard.